UUID Generator

Generate RFC 4122 compliant UUIDs for databases, APIs, and applications

What is a UUID?

A UUID (Universally Unique Identifier), also known as a GUID (Globally Unique Identifier), is a 128-bit number used to uniquely identify information in computer systems. UUIDs follow the RFC 4122 standard and are typically displayed as 32 hexadecimal digits separated by hyphens in the format 8-4-4-4-12, such as "550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000". The primary advantage of UUIDs is their ability to be generated independently across distributed systems without coordination or central authority, while still maintaining near-zero probability of collision. Unlike sequential database IDs that require a central numbering system, UUIDs can be created by any system at any time and still remain globally unique. This makes them essential for distributed databases, microservices architectures, and scenarios where data from multiple sources must be merged without ID conflicts. Our UUID generator creates Version 4 UUIDs, which use random or pseudo-random numbers, providing 122 bits of randomness with a collision probability so low it's effectively zero for practical purposes. The tool generates cryptographically secure UUIDs using the Web Cryptography API, ensuring true randomness rather than predictable patterns. All UUID generation happens locally in your browser, meaning the generated identifiers never leave your device and aren't stored anywhere.

Common Uses for UUIDs

UUIDs serve as universal identifiers across countless software applications and systems where unique identification is critical. Database primary keys benefit from UUIDs by allowing offline record creation without requiring database coordination to assign IDs, particularly valuable in distributed systems and mobile applications that sync later. RESTful APIs use UUIDs as resource identifiers in URLs because they're unguessable and don't reveal information about the number of resources, unlike sequential IDs. Distributed systems including microservices and cloud applications rely on UUIDs to identify records, transactions, and sessions across multiple services without central coordination. Document and file management systems use UUIDs to prevent filename collisions when uploading files from multiple users or sources. Message queuing systems like RabbitMQ, Kafka, and AWS SQS use UUIDs to identify individual messages uniquely across distributed queues. Session management in web applications employs UUIDs as session tokens to track user sessions securely without predictable patterns. Transaction IDs in payment systems and financial applications use UUIDs to ensure each transaction has a globally unique identifier for tracking and auditing. Cloud storage services assign UUIDs to objects and files to manage them across distributed storage nodes. Mobile app development uses UUIDs to identify devices, installations, and user accounts uniquely. Event sourcing and CQRS architectures use UUIDs to identify events and aggregates in event stores. Version control and content management systems employ UUIDs to track changes, versions, and content items across distributed repositories. OAuth tokens and API keys incorporate UUIDs to create unguessable, unique authentication credentials. Test data generation uses UUIDs to create unique identifiers for testing scenarios. IoT devices use UUIDs to identify sensors, devices, and readings uniquely across distributed networks.

UUID Versions Explained

The RFC 4122 standard defines five UUID versions, each with different generation methods and use cases. Version 1 UUIDs incorporate the MAC address of the computer generating the UUID along with a timestamp, making them unique but potentially revealing information about when and where they were created, raising privacy concerns. Version 2 UUIDs are similar to Version 1 but incorporate POSIX UID/GID information, making them rarely used due to limited specification and similar privacy issues. Version 3 and Version 5 UUIDs are generated by hashing a namespace identifier and name using MD5 (Version 3) or SHA-1 (Version 5), producing deterministic UUIDs where the same namespace and name always generate the same UUID, useful for creating reproducible identifiers from known inputs. Version 4 UUIDs, which our generator creates, use random or pseudo-random numbers for the entire UUID except for specific version and variant bits, providing excellent uniqueness properties without revealing any information about when, where, or how they were generated. This makes Version 4 the most popular choice for general-purpose unique identification. The randomness provides 122 bits of entropy, meaning the probability of generating two identical UUIDs is approximately 1 in 5.3 quintillion, which is effectively impossible for practical applications. When choosing a UUID version, consider your requirements: use Version 4 for general-purpose unique identification with maximum privacy and simplicity, Version 5 when you need deterministic UUIDs from known inputs, and avoid Version 1 unless you specifically need timestamp-based ordering and don't have privacy concerns. Most modern applications default to Version 4 for its simplicity, security, and lack of dependencies on system-specific information.

UUID Best Practices

Implementing UUIDs effectively requires understanding their characteristics and following established best practices. Use Version 4 UUIDs for most applications as they provide excellent uniqueness without privacy concerns or dependencies on system-specific information like MAC addresses or timestamps. Store UUIDs efficiently in databases by using native UUID or BINARY(16) column types rather than VARCHAR or CHAR, as this reduces storage from 36 bytes to 16 bytes and improves index performance significantly. When using UUIDs as primary keys, consider the impact on database performance, as random UUIDs can cause page splits and fragmentation in B-tree indexes. Some databases offer sequential UUID generation or UUID-to-BINARY conversion functions to mitigate this. Index UUIDs appropriately for query performance, but be aware that UUID indexes are larger than integer indexes and may impact performance for very large tables. Always validate UUID format when accepting them as input to prevent injection attacks or data corruption, using proper validation libraries rather than simple string matching. Use lowercase formatting for UUIDs as it's the recommended standard, though be prepared to handle uppercase UUIDs from systems that generate them. Avoid including braces unless required by specific systems like Microsoft's GUID format. When displaying UUIDs in user interfaces, consider whether users need to see the full UUID or just a shortened version for readability. Document your UUID usage patterns in API documentation, specifying version, format, and any special handling requirements. Don't attempt to parse information from UUIDs unless you're using Version 1, 3, or 5 specifically for their deterministic properties. Use UUIDs consistently across related systems to maintain data integrity and simplify integrations.

UUIDs vs Sequential IDs

The choice between UUIDs and sequential IDs involves trade-offs in performance, security, scalability, and system complexity. Sequential IDs (auto-incrementing integers) offer excellent database performance, smaller storage requirements (4-8 bytes vs 16 bytes), faster index operations, and natural ordering that UUIDs lack. They're ideal for single-database systems where a central authority can assign IDs safely. However, sequential IDs expose information about your system, such as the number of records (ID 1000 means about 1000 records exist), creation order, and growth rate, which can leak business intelligence to competitors. Sequential IDs also cause problems in distributed systems where multiple databases need to generate IDs independently, requiring complex coordination mechanisms or ID range allocation. UUIDs excel in distributed environments where components must generate IDs independently without coordination, preventing conflicts when merging data from different sources. They don't reveal information about record counts or creation patterns, providing better privacy and security. UUIDs enable offline record creation in mobile and distributed applications that sync later, as there's no need to contact a central server for ID assignment. However, UUIDs have larger storage requirements, slightly slower index performance, and no inherent ordering. Database page fragmentation can occur with random UUIDs as primary keys, though some databases offer sequential UUID generation to mitigate this. For API design, UUIDs prevent malicious users from guessing other resource IDs to access unauthorized data, while sequential IDs make it trivial to enumerate all resources. Consider using UUIDs for microservices, distributed systems, public APIs, and scenarios requiring data merging. Use sequential IDs for single-database applications, performance-critical systems with massive scale, and internal tools where ID exposure isn't concerning. Hybrid approaches exist, such as using UUIDs as primary keys but maintaining sequential IDs for internal ordering and display.

Need other developer tools? Try our SHA256 Hash Generator, Base64 Encoder, Random Number Generator, PIN Generator, or our security tools like Random Password Generator, Passphrase Generator, Password List Generator, Weak Password Checker, or Username Generator.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the probability of UUID collision?

The probability of generating duplicate Version 4 UUIDs is astronomically low. With 122 bits of randomness, you would need to generate approximately 2.7 quintillion UUIDs to have a 50% chance of a single collision. For practical purposes, UUID collisions are impossible. Even generating one billion UUIDs per second, it would take over 85 years to reach a 50% collision probability. Your application will encounter other bugs long before experiencing a UUID collision.

Should I use UUIDs as database primary keys?

UUIDs work well as primary keys in distributed systems, microservices, and scenarios requiring data merging from multiple sources. They prevent ID conflicts when combining data and allow offline record creation. However, they have larger storage requirements and can cause index fragmentation. For single-database applications where performance is critical, sequential IDs may be better. Many systems use a hybrid approach: UUIDs as external identifiers and sequential IDs for internal operations.

Can I use UUIDs in URLs?

Yes, UUIDs work excellently in URLs as resource identifiers. They're URL-safe without encoding, don't reveal information about your system like sequential IDs do, and prevent users from guessing other resource URLs. For example: /api/users/550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000. This makes your API more secure compared to sequential IDs like /api/users/123 where users can easily try other numbers to access unauthorized resources.

Is this UUID generator truly random and secure?

Yes, our UUID generator uses the Web Cryptography API's cryptographically secure random number generator, providing true randomness suitable for security-critical applications. The generation happens entirely in your browser, so UUIDs are never transmitted to servers or stored anywhere. The implementation follows RFC 4122 standards for Version 4 UUIDs, properly setting version and variant bits while randomizing all other bits.

What is the difference between UUID and GUID?

UUID (Universally Unique Identifier) and GUID (Globally Unique Identifier) refer to the same concept and are often used interchangeably. The main difference is terminology: UUID is the standard term from RFC 4122 used across most platforms, while GUID is Microsoft's term for the same thing. Microsoft GUIDs are sometimes formatted with braces {550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000}, but they're functionally identical to UUIDs.